Topic

Author

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Market Intel & Insights
Denis Cook

Denis Cook

September 9, 2024

How Big is the Transferable Tax Credit Market?

Reunion estimates that the total size of the clean energy tax credit market will surpass $45B in 2024, of which $21B to $24B will be transferred. The remainder will be monetized through tax equity, direct pay, or retention.

Market Intel & Insights

For Buyers

Executive Summary with Image

Executive summary

Over the past 12 months, the rate of growth in the transferable tax credit market has continually surprised industry observers and participants.

Reunion has analyzed how large the transferable tax credit market could be on an annual basis, as well as the size of various monetization strategies – tax equity, direct pay, retention, and transfer.

We estimate that the total size of the transferable tax credit market in 2024 will range from $45B to $50B, which will be broken into four key monetization strategies:

  • Transfer: $21B to $24B
  • Tax equity: $21B to $23B
  • Retain: $1.8B to $2.4B
  • Direct pay: $0.8B to $1.0B
Reunion - Estimated Size of Transferable Tax Credit Market in 2024

Over a nine-year period, Reunion estimates the total volume of clean energy tax credits to steadily climb, surpassing $90B in 2030.

Of the annual total, we expect approximately 50% to 60% to be monetized through transferability.

Reunion - Estimated Size of Transferable Tax Credit Market Through 2032

We ran our estimate through 2032 for two reasons. Under the §45X credit, manufactured components are subject to a four-year phase-down beginning in 2030 (75%, 50%, 25%, 0%). Therefore, manufactured components will no longer be eligible for the §45X after 2032. Also, 2032 is the first potential "applicable year" for the four-year phase-out of the §45Y PTC and §48E ITC.

Jump to a section

  • Total transfer market: How many clean energy tax credits will be transfer in 2024?
  • Tax equityHow many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized through traditional tax equity in 2024?
  • Direct pay: How many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized through direct pay in 2024?
  • Retain: How many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized directly by the developer, manufacturer, or refiner in 2024?
  • Transfer: How many clean energy tax credits will be transferred in 2024?
  • Stranded: How many clean energy tax credits will not be monetized in 2024?
  • Looking ahead: How many clean energy tax credits will be eligible for transfer through 2032? Of these, how many will be transferred?

TOTAL TRANSFER MARKET: $45B - $50B
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits will be eligible for transfer in 2024?

To estimate the total size of the market for transferable tax credits in 2024, we reviewed several existing estimates by industry observers:

  • Congressional Budget Office
  • Credit Suisse
  • Evercore ISI
  • Goldman Sachs
  • University of Pennsylvania, Penn Wharton Budget Model

Our analysis identified two key trends:

  • A significant increase in estimates following the passage of the IRA: Before August 2022, estimates of the volume of tax credits that would be generated following the passage of the IRA were clustered below $20B. After the IRA became law, estimates markedly increased
  • Clustering between $45B and $50B: More recent estimates have fallen between $45B and $50B
$19B | University of Pennsylvania, Penn Wharton Budget Model (July 2022)

Shortly before the passage of the IRA, the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) provided a preliminary estimate of the budgetary effects of the legislation from 2022 through 2031.

The report pegged the ten-year cost of the IRA's "climate and energy" provisions at $369B and the 2024 cost at $35.7B. Importantly, PWBM's climate and energy bucket includes several sets of provisions:

  • Tax rebates and credits to lower energy costs for households
  • Tax credits, research, loans, and grants to increase domestic manufacturing capacity for wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, and other essential components of clean energy production and storage
  • Tax credits to reduce carbon emissions
  • Programs to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture
  • A new fee on methane emissions

To isolate transferable tax credits, we can pull percentages for the various climate and energy provisions from an updated PWBM analysis (which we'll discuss in further detail): 

The resulting cost of transferable tax credits for 2024, then, is 54% of $35.7B, or $19.2B. If we apply the same percentage to the ten-year window, we arrive at a total cost of $198.3B for transferable tax credits.

$11B | Congressional Budget Office (August 2022)

In an August 2022 report, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the annualized budgetary effects of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) from 2022 to 2031. The report covers the entirety of the IRA, although transferable tax credits are broken out by their IRA section. IRA section 13101, for example, extends the §45 PTC.

The CBO estimates the ten-year budgetary impacts of transferable tax credits at $209.8B, $10.5B of which is in 2024.

$20B | University of Pennsylvania, Penn Wharton Budget Model (August 2022)

Once the Senate had passed the IRA, PWBM updated their July 2022 estimated budgetary effects of the IRA. The analysis, from August 2022, resulted in a slight uptick in cost across the board.

To estimate the size of the transferable tax credit market, we have to again scale the "climate and energy" provisions by 54%. The result is $20.0B for 2024 and $206.8B for 2022 through 2031.

$49B | Credit Suisse (November 2022)

Credit Suisse produced one of several analyses that argued initial estimates of the size of the IRA were low – perhaps as much as 3x too low:

"Climate spending will likely be significantly higher than the headline estimate. Roughly two-thirds of the baseline spending is allocated to provisions where the potential federal credit/incentive is uncapped. Our assessment of potential demand for clean electricity production tax credits (PTC) and investment tax credits (ITC), carbon capture, clean hydrogen, and renewable/battery manufacturing credits shows federal spending could reach >3x the cost estimates assigned for these key provisions. The advanced manufacturing provision alone could cost US$250 billion given the credits across solar, wind, and battery supply chains."

Credit Suisse estimated the ten-year cost of transferable tax credits at $528B and the 2024 cost at $49B.

Wood Mackenzie similarly argued that the long-term cost of the IRA would greatly surpass initial estimates. However, Wood Mackenzie focused their analysis on ITCs and PTCs from solar, wind, and storage, so we omitted it from our review.

$33B | Goldman Sachs (March 2023)

Goldman Sachs published an in-depth analysis of the costs and benefits of the IRA and, like Credit Suisse, concluded that early estimates were drastically low. Goldman Sachs estimated the IRA will cost the U.S. government $1.2T by 2032, with some incentives continuing into 2040.

To arrive at an estimate for the 2024 tax credit market, we should remove EVs and buildings from Goldman's estimate because these credits apply largely to individuals and will not be transferred. In exhibit 18, Goldman Sachs estimates that EV- and biofuel-related IRA programs will cost the U.S. government $393B and $43B, respectively.

If we apply this ratio – 90.1% EVs, 9.9% biofuels – to the combined 2024 estimate for “EVs and biofuels,” we remove approximately $9B of cost from 2024, resulting in an annual total of approximately $35B. Buildings further reduce this estimate by approximately $2B, resulting in an 2024 cost of approximately $33B.

Although Goldman Sachs did not publish a year-by-year estimate for transferable tax credits, they assembled a chart of annual IRA spending:

$48B | University of Pennsylvania, Penn Wharton Budget Model (April 2023)

Shortly after the Goldman Sachs report, PWBM released a third estimate of the budgetary effects of the IRA. Importantly, GWBM relied heavily on the Goldman Sachs report: "In preparing these updated estimates, PWBM consulted with private sector experts to understand the likely growth in utilization by climate and energy provision. We are especially grateful to the energy team at Goldman Sachs who helped break down each area and further aided our efforts to produce a budget score against the pre-IRA baseline."

PWBM estimated the total cost of the IRA's energy and climate provisions from 2023 through 2032 – a new ten-year window – at $1.0B. If we isolate transferable tax credits, we arrive at a total of $561B.

We can allocate the $561B total over the ten-year window, assuming a similar annual allocation percentage from PWBM's earlier estimates. Under this assumption, we get $48.3B for 2024.

$47B | Evercore ISI (April 2024)

“Drawing on projections from the U.S. Treasury,” Evercore ISI estimated that the “total addressable market of potentially transferable energy tax credits is $47 billion in 2024.” Evercore notes that “not all these credits will ultimately be transferred” – a key detail we'll explore below.

Viewing the estimates through time

When viewed through time, the eight estimates we've examined exhibit two trends:

  • A significant increase in estimates following the passage of the IRA: Before August 2022, estimates of the volume of tax credits that would be generated following the passage of the IRA were clustered below $20B. After the IRA became law, estimates markedly increased
  • Clustering between $45B and $50B: More recent estimates have tended to fall in the high $40B range

TAX EQUITY: $21B - $23B
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized through traditional tax equity in 2024?

With the passage of the IRA, clean energy tax credits can be monetized through transferability, traditional tax equity, or "hybrid" structures involving some mix of both. To properly size the transferability market, then, we need to remove "pure play" tax equity.

Although precise tax equity transaction volumes are not publicly available, Norton Rose Fulbright provides reliable snapshots in their annual cost of capital webinar. In the 2024 cost of capital webinar, for example, Jack Cargas of Bank of America and Rubiao Song of JPMorgan estimated the 2023 tax equity market at $20B to $22B: 

  • Jack Cargas, Bank of America: "We estimate that the volume was $20 to $21 billion [in 2023], roughly in the same ballpark as the year before."
  • Rubiao Song, JPMorgan: "We saw a slight uptick in tax equity volume in 2023 compared to 2022.  We put the traditional tax equity at $21 to $22 billion in 2023."

We can create a ten-year series by reviewing the transcripts from prior years – 2023, 2022, 2021, etc.

When estimating 2024 tax equity volumes, Rubiao Song said, "If the economy remains strong, we could see tax equity volume growing by single-to-low double digits."

Despite uncertainty around the potential impacts of Basel III requirements on tax equity investments, Reunion estimates that $21B to $23B of tax credits will be monetized through traditional tax equity in 2024.

Importantly, the amount of tax equity investment is not directly representative of tax credit generation, as some amount of investment is associated with benefits of depreciation and the rights to future project cash flows. However, for purposes of this simplified analysis, we have ignored this distinction and will address it in future discussions.

DIRECT PAY: $0.8B - $1.0B
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized through direct pay in 2024?

Of the approximately $47B in 2024 tax credits that are eligible for transfer, some will be monetized through direct pay. As Evercore notes in their report, "For a subset of credits" – 45X, 45Q, and 45V – "companies may take advantage of a time-limited provision through which they can receive the credit as a direct payment from the [IRS] after filing their tax returns." 

Evercore goes on to emphasize that, "Figures on project registrations released by the U.S. Treasury suggest that even in cases where the seller would have the option for 'direct pay' after filing tax returns, the vast majority are still opting for transfer."

As the Treasury stated, "More than 98% of...facilities or projects are pursuing transferability."

Based on Reunion's 2024 transactions data, which covers nearly $5B in verified transactions, Reunion estimates $0.8B to $1.0B in 2024 tax credits will be monetized through direct pay in 2024. (We can perform a simple check on our estimate by scaling our $47B total market value by 98%, which results in $0.94B.)

RETAIN: $1.8B - $2.4B
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits that are eligible for transferability will be monetized directly by the developer, manufacturer, or refiner in 2024?

Based on SEC filings from large, publicly traded utilities, Reunion estimates that 4% to 5% of 2024 tax credits will be retained by developers, manufacturers, and refiners to offset their own tax liability. They will not, in other words, transfer all of their IRA tax credits.

In their 2023 10-K, for example, Duke Energy states, "...due to its existing tax attributes and projected tax credits to be generated related to the IRA, Duke Energy does not expect to be a significant federal cash taxpayer until around 2030."

Reunion's estimates that $1.8B to $2.4B of clean energy tax credits will be retained by their originator.

TRANSFER: $21B - $24B
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits will ultimately be transferred in 2024?

In the simplest sense, tax credit transfers become the "plug" in our equation: [total tax credit market] = [tax equity] + [direct pay] + [retention] + [transfer].

Recognizing that we have provided estimated ranges for each value, we can create a "high" and "low" case resulting in an estimated transfer market range of $21B to $24B.

"STRANDED" CREDITS
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits will fail to be monetized, irrespective of strategy?

Although we've focused our anaylsis on accretive monetization strategies, it's worth noting the existence of a fifth bucket: "stranded" credits. These are credits that are generated but, for whatever reason, not monetized through tax equity, transferability, direct pay, or retention.

Reunion has seen stranded credits first-hand with smaller developers who were unable to successfully transfer 2023 credits with values in the low hundreds of thousands. We also assume some stranded credits will emerge from developers in financial distress.

We believe stranded credits constitute a de minimis and hard-to-estimate segment of the transferability market and have excluded them from our analysis.

LOOKING AHEAD
Custom Colored Line

How many clean energy tax credits will be eligible for transfer through the early 2030s? Of these, how many will be transferred?

We expect the overall tax credit market to grow by an average of 10% to 15% per year, peaking in 2030. The highest percentage of this growth will occur in transferability (versus other monetization strategies). We estimate that the total tax credit market will approach $700B through 2032, over $350B of which will be monetized through transferability.

We ran our estimate through 2032 for two reasons. Under the §45X credit, manufactured components are subject to a four-year phase-down beginning in 2030 (75%, 50%, 25%, 0%). Therefore, manufactured components will no longer be eligible for the §45X after 2032. Also, 2032 is the first potential "applicable year" for the four-year phase-out of the §45Y PTC and §48E ITC.

Further updates to come

Reunion will update and refine this analysis as we facilitate more transactions and further data comes to market. If your team has data to share on an anonymized basis, we would welcome the opportunity to connect.

Due Diligence & Risk Management
Andy Moon

Andy Moon

August 28, 2024

Reunion and CAC Specialty to host webinar on Thursday, September 5th for tax credit buyers

Jordan Tamchin, Executive Vice President and leader of the Tax Insurance Practice at CAC Specialty, joins our Q3 buyer office hours on Thursday, September 5th at 2:00pm ET.

Due Diligence & Risk Management

For Buyers

Jordan Tamchin, Executive Vice President and leader of the Tax Insurance Practice at CAC Specialty, will join Reunion's transactions team for a 60-minute workshop covering recent market developments in tax credit insurance and a lively discussion about unique tax insurance solutions that have emerged in 2024.

Register

Instructions for joining the webinar will be sent once you have registered. If you have any questions, please contact Maria Verbaite.

URL Button

We will make a recording available for those who cannot attend the webinar live.

Topics

  • Tax credit insurance at a glance: Typical covered tax positions and exclusions
  • Market snapshot: Depth of insurance market, pricing considerations, underwriting standards
  • Emerging issues and trends: Coverage of step ups, PWA underwriting, bonus credit adder coverage, buy side vs sell side policies, typical limits of liability, audit experience
  • Audience Q&A

Speakers

Jordan Tamchin – CAC Specialty

Jordan Tamchin is Executive Vice President and leader of the Tax Insurance Practice at CAC Specialty, where he specializes in delivering innovative and unique insurance solutions for the most complex tax risks across a variety of tax credit and tax equity deals.

Andy Moon and Billy Lee – Reunion

Andy Moon and Billy Lee are the co-founders of Reunion and work closely with Fortune 500 corporations and clean energy companies to buy and sell clean energy tax credits.

Andy and Billy have led hundreds of clean energy financings since 2006, including some of the first solar transactions with institutions such as US Bank, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, D.E. Shaw, and others. 

Questions welcome

We want our office hours to be interactive, so please bring any questions you have, whether related to current market conditions, pricing, or commercial terms.

You're welcome to ask questions beforehand.

Due Diligence & Risk Management
Connie Chern, CPA

Connie Chern, CPA

August 23, 2024

Section 48 ITC Due Diligence and Documentation Guide

This due diligence checklist and documentation guide gives tax credit buyers, sellers, and their respective advisors a set of shared expectations on the required analysis and documentation for §48 investment tax credits.

Due Diligence & Risk Management

For Sellers

For Buyers

Executive summary

Transferable tax credits are sold at a discount to face value, providing attractive financial benefits to corporate investors. They are not without risk, however, and tax credit buyers should have a clear sense of how to identify, track, and mitigate relevant risks.

At the same time, clean energy developers should understand the scope of due diligence during a tax credit transfer.

This due diligence checklist and documentation guide gives tax credit buyers, sellers, and their respective advisors a set of shared expectations on the required analysis and documentation for §48 investment tax credits.

To download a PDF version of this guide, please visit our resources page.

URL Button

Light Grey Line

Jump to a due diligence category

Light Grey Line

Transaction overview

The transaction overview should include an overall description of the transaction, including:

  • Brief description of sponsor
  • Technology
  • Project size in MW AC, location, and description
  • Placed in service (PIS) date
  • Eligible cost basis
  • Resulting ITC credit amount
  • Description of tax credit percentage, including bonus credit adders and compliance with, or exemption from, prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements
  • Details on how the project is financed

Major deal participants

Tax credit transfers involve a range of stakeholders on the buy- and sell-sides, all of whom should be memorialized for reference during the five-year recapture period.

Diligence item Discussion
Seller Name of company, principal place of business
Guarantor Name of company, principal place of business, relationship to Seller
Offtaker Entity that purchases power from the Project
Seller counsel Name of company, POC
Tax credit insurance broker Name of company, POC
Tax credit insurer Name of company, POC

Seller diligence

Diligence item Discussion
Organization chart Summary of Seller and related entities, including ownership percentages and federal tax treatment (e.g., partnership, C-corporation, disregarded entity, etc.).
Affiliate transactions Buyer should investigate whether fees included in the cost basis are from affiliate transactions. For example, the EPC fee may not be eligible for inclusion in the Project’s cost basis if the EPC is an affiliate of the Seller.
Organizational documents Corporate documentation of the project company (if applicable), Seller, and the guarantor (if applicable).
Financial statements [Audited] financial statements of the Seller and/or Guarantor, for purposes of understanding the financial strength of Seller and/or Guarantor and its ability to fulfill indemnification obligations. If the financial strength of Seller is in doubt (e.g., if the indemnity is not provided by a creditworthy guarantor), then Buyer or Seller can also procure tax credit insurance from an investment grade insurer.
Fiscal year end The Seller’s fiscal year end will impact the tax year in which the Buyer can take the credit.
Upstream ownership If Seller is not a widely held C-corporation, Buyer should perform diligence on whether Seller is subject to at risk rules of Section 49. Ensure that any project financing in place does not limit Seller’s ability to sell credits.
Tax return filing date Understand timing of when Seller intends to file. This may impact the timing of when a transaction needs to be closed (e.g., if Seller is planning to file taxes by April 15, Seller will want to close the transaction in advance of filing).
Legal actions Buyer will confirm that there is no ongoing or pending legal action or notice of legal action concerning the Project.

Qualification

Buyer should validate that the Project qualifies for the §48 tax credit. Buyer should ensure that the Project qualifies as energy property, the proper cost basis is used, and that the Project was placed in service in the appropriate tax year.

Diligence item Discussion
Description of asset/project Brief overall description of the Project.
Begun construction date Begun construction date only needs to be investigated in certain situations, such as when the Project claims exemption from prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements due to construction starting prior to January 29, 2023. If a certain “begun construction” date is claimed, Buyer should look for documentation on how safe harbors were met (e.g., 5% test or physical work test).
Placed in service date Buyer should validate when the Project was placed in service, to ensure that credits are applicable to the desired tax year. The IRS and various courts consider five tests to determine when a project was placed in service. The Seller should ideally provide evidence that all five tests are met: (1) the receipt of required licenses and permits; (2) the passage of control of the facility to the ultimate taxpayer; (3) the completion of critical tests; (4) the commencement of regular operations; and (5) the synchronization of the facility into a power grid for generating electricity to produce income.
Cost segregation study Buyer should ensure that the cost basis for purposes of calculating a §48 ITC is validated through a cost segregation study (and section 1060 analysis, if applicable) from a reputable accounting firm with energy project experience.
EPC/installation contracts documentation Buyer should review the Seller’s Equipment, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contract(s). Buyer should validate that the primary EPC and the subcontractors are not related to the Seller, as fees charged by a related entity may not be valid for purposes of calculating cost basis for a §48 ITC. The EPC contract will also need to include representations and warranties around compliance and documentation with respect to prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements for both employees and subcontractors if the Project is not exempt from PWA requirements.
Appraisal In certain cases, especially when there is a step-up in cost basis for purposes of calculating a §48 ITC, Buyer should ensure that an appraisal is performed by a qualified third-party valuation firm. Buyer should ensure that the Project’s cost basis falls within the range of the appraised fair market value (FMV) based on a reasonable analysis of cost, income, and market approaches to valuation. Buyer should request a copy of the appraisal and form reliance letter.
Transfer filing and registration Buyer should obtain a copy of transfer filing documentation with registration number(s) for the Project(s).

Structure

Buyer should validate that Seller is an eligible transferor, and that the Seller’s underlying legal structure will be respected by the IRS.

Diligence item Discussion
Structure documentation Buyer should validate that the Seller is entitled to claim and to transfer the tax credits and that the Seller’s legal structure (e.g., sale leaseback, partnership) will be respected by the IRS. For example, a clean energy project company might be sold to a joint venture with ownership from an arms-length third party, to effectuate a “step-up” in the cost basis for purposes of calculating the §48 tax credit. Buyer should ensure that the Seller entity has sufficient equity ownership from an arms-length third party, and that the third party is a true equity owner (with both upside and downside risk). Buyer should also validate that the JV is eligible to claim and to transfer the tax credits. A legal firm can provide a memo on validity of structure.

Recapture

To avoid recapture, a §48 ITC requires that (1) the property remains qualified energy property for five years and (2) there is no change in ownership of the property for five years. If a project fails to meet these requirements, the IRS will recapture the unvested portion of the ITC.

The ITC vests equally over a five-year period, meaning 20% of the total ITCs claimed will vest on each anniversary of Project’s placed in service date.

Qualified energy facility

A property can cease to be qualified energy property when an asset is disposed of, or otherwise ceases to be investment credit property to the eligible taxpayer during the recapture period. For example, the asset is:

  • Destroyed and not rebuilt and placed back in service
  • Abandoned
  • Repurposed to sell something other than electricity derived from the qualified generation asset

Key risk mitigation measures include sufficient property and casualty insurance, adequate site control and interconnection rights, and identification of alternatives in the event of an Offtaker default.

Diligence item Discussion
Site control documentation Buyer should validate that the Project has an unencumbered right to operate on the site during the five-year recapture period. If the site is leased, a recorded lease with title insurance may improve Buyer comfort that the site is secure. If the Project cannot be moved, Buyer should also confirm there are no environmental issues on the site that could materially impact Project operations. Environmental issues are typically flagged in a Phase I environmental site assessment report with a map and/or description of any Recognized Environmental Condition located on the site.
Interconnection documentation Buyer should confirm that the Project has approval for interconnection during the five-year recapture period.
O&M contracts documentation §48 ITCs are subject to recapture if the project is placed out of service during the five-year recapture period. Buyer should review the O&M contract to ensure that the Project will be adequately maintained. The O&M contract will also need to include covenants around compliance and documentation with respect to prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements unless the Project is exempt from prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.
Property and casualty insurance Buyer should validate that Property and Casualty insurance is in place, and that coverage is high enough for the Seller to rebuild the Project in the event of a P&C event. If the Project is taken out of service due to a P&C event, the §48 ITC may be subject to recapture.
Offtake/revenue contract As §48 ITCs are subject to recapture if the Project is placed out of service during the five-year recapture period, Buyer should validate that the Project will earn sufficient revenues during the recapture period to continue operating. If electricity is being sold on a merchant basis, Buyer should validate that the Project has the ability to sell electricity to the grid. If electricity is sold to a separate power purchaser, Buyer should review the Seller’s power purchase agreement or similar contract, diligence the ability of the power purchaser to fulfill contractual obligations and understand alternative revenue sources if the power purchaser is unable to pay.

Change in ownership

A change in ownership can occur if the project owner transfers its ownership of the facility during the five-year recapture period. If a lender has a collateral interest in the project company, a foreclosure can trigger recapture due to change in ownership.

Key risk mitigation measures include a forbearance agreement with lenders, structuring the debt in a way that foreclosure will not trigger a recapture, and indemnification from the seller.

Diligence item Discussion
Project financing documentation Buyer should confirm there is no tax-exempt financing for the Project. Buyer should also confirm if there is any financing agreement where such lenders or other financing parties have collateral security in the Project or in any intermediate holding company between the project company and Seller. If a change in ownership is triggered by a foreclosure during the recapture period, the unvested portion of the §48 ITC will be subject to recapture. Ideally, debt should be structured in a way that a foreclosure will not result in a recapture, or a forbearance agreement should be in place with lenders.

Prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements

Buyer should validate that the Project is exempt from, or compliant with, prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements. Prevailing wage rules require that certain workers are paid a minimum prevailing wages specified by the U.S. Department of Labor during the construction of a facility or property, and during alteration or repair of a facility or property for a certain number of years after the project is placed in service.

Buyers should require proper documentation that the correct wage was paid.

Exempt from PWA
Diligence item Discussion
Prevailing wage and apprenticeship Project is exempt from PWA requirements under two scenarios:
  • Project began construction prior to January 29, 2023. Buyer should look for documentation on how safe harbors were met (e.g., 5% test or physical work test)
  • Project’s maximum net output is less than one megawatt (as measured in alternating current) or the capacity of electrical or equivalent thermal storage is less than one megawatt (as measured in alternating current). Buyer should validate size of Project through audit of contracts

Compliant with PWA
Diligence item Discussion
Prevailing wage and apprenticeship If Project requires compliance with PWA, Buyer should validate that proper documentation was collected, including payroll records for each laborer and mechanic (including each qualified apprentice) employed by the taxpayer, contractor, or subcontractor employed. Buyer should review the representations and warranties in the contract with the primary EPC (and potentially with their subcontractors) to validate that all parties will comply with PWA requirements.

The IRS also recommends collecting additional documentation, which are listed in proposed regulations §1.45-12(b) and (c) and can be requested by Buyer to further validate PWA documentation practices.

Bonus credits

If a Project claims a bonus credit adder (domestic content, low-income community, or energy community), the Buyer should substantiate that the Project qualifies for the relevant bonus credit adder.

Domestic content
Diligence item Discussion
Domestic content If Project claims the domestic content bonus adder, Buyer should verify supporting cost analysis from a third-party engineer, and/or supporting documentation from legal counsel.

If the Seller utilized the domestic content safe harbor under IRS Notice 2024-41, Buyer will want to validate the developer’s safe harbor calculations, collect documentation confirming the sourcing of components and sub-components included in the calculations, and view the developer’s safe harbor certification. In many cases, a legal memorandum may be prepared by seller counsel to analyze and confirm compliance with domestic content requirements.

Energy community
Diligence item Discussion
Energy community If Project claims the energy community bonus adder, Buyer should verify documentation that Project is located in the “Brownfield Category, the Statistical Area Category, or the Coal Closure Category” as described in IRS Notice 2024-30.

For §48 and §48E ITCs, eligibility for the energy community bonus credit is determined on the date that the Project is placed in service, and in the event the Project is only partially located in an energy community, the following guidance applies:
  • A project qualifies for the energy community bonus if at least half (50%) of its nameplate capacity is in an energy community. According to the IRS, nameplate capacity is the DC capacity that the project is capable of producing on a steady-state basis during continuous operation under standard conditions
  • If a project does not have a nameplate capacity, it can qualify for the energy community bonus under the “footprint test.” If 50% or more of the project’s square footage is located in an energy community, then the project qualifies for the bonus. The percentage is determined by dividing the square footage of the project that is located in the energy community by the total square footage of the project

Low-income community
Diligence item Discussion
Low-income community If the Project claims the low-income community bonus adder, Buyer should verify that the Project received an acceptance/allocation notice from the IRS as well as confirmation that the project was placed in service within a statutorily set four-year period.

To validate that the project was properly placed in service, the developer must provide documentation and make attestations in the DOE low-income community application portal.

Tax credit insurance

If a Seller is unable to offer an indemnity from a creditworthy guarantor, tax credit insurance is commonly purchased to provide additional risk mitigation in the event of a disallowance or recapture of credits.

There is a robust market for tax credit insurance, which has been utilized on tax equity transactions for over a decade. Tax Credit Insurance Brokers can help place insurance with a wide selection of investment-grade insurance carriers.

Diligence item Discussion
Tax credit insurance Buyer should validate that tax credit insurance covers desired risks, which potentially include:
  • Qualification, recapture, and structure risk
  • Representations and warranties
  • Prevailing wage and apprenticeship compliance or exemption
  • Bonus credit adders
Buyer should confirm that the insurance policy is adequately sized to cover potential damages, including lost credits, tax gross-up, penalties, interest, and contest costs in the event of a disallowance or recapture of credits.

Download Reunion's Section 48 ITC due diligence guide

To download Reunion's Section 48 due diligence guide in PDF format, please visit our resources page.

URL Button

Market Intel & Insights
Denis Cook

Denis Cook

August 16, 2024

The transferable tax credit market continues to evolve, and Reunion is seeing several key trends emerge

The transferable tax credit market continues to evolve, and Reunion is seeing several key trends emerge

Market Intel & Insights

For Sellers

For Buyers

Reunion recently surpassed $1.5B in clean energy tax credit sales in 2024. Our transactions have spanned solar, wind, battery storage, fuel cells, biomass, and advanced manufacturing components.

Our team works directly with dozens of Fortune 500 tax credit buyers and leading clean energy companies, and we have observed several emerging trends in 2024.

Speed of execution is a critical factor in winning deals

An increasing number of deals are competitive bidding situations. Buyers should have a clear sense from relevant stakeholders — e.g., CFO, legal, board of directors — on what deal terms are acceptable and what specific approvals are required prior to starting the negotiation process, as delays can be the difference between winning and losing a deal.

We have seen several companies proactively establish investment thresholds that allow them to move quickly for the right credit.

Very large credits carry premium pricing

There has been increased interest in tax credit purchases from major corporations that pay $500M to $1B or more in annual taxes, resulting in more competition for large credit opportunities.

These opportunities tend to trade at a premium — upwards of $0.01 to $0.02, depending on the credit type.

Buyers are increasingly interested in ITCs

Many buyers were reluctant to pay for ITCs early in the year because doing so required them to “pre-pay” their taxes. Buyers, consequently, willing to purchase ITCs in Q1 or Q2 were rewarded with deeper discounts.

Now that we are in Q3 and payments for ITCs will not occur until later in the year, buyer interest has increased.

Pricing on ITCs, PTCs, and AMPCs trended upward in Q3

Buyers, particularly ones that have bid and lost on tax credit opportunities, want to make sure that they lock in credits in time to offset Q3 and/or Q4 estimated tax payments.

There is a price ceiling on ITC transactions

ITCs are still expected to trade at a wider discount compared to production credits. Although sellers often ask for mid-$0.90s pricing for ITCs, buyers typically push back since lower-risk PTCs or AMPCs would be available at similar pricing.

Scope and coverage of insurance is a focus of deal negotiation

Initially, tax credit buyers demanded tax credit insurance to cover 100% or more of the tax credit value. We are seeing more flexibility in structures, whereby insurance may not cover the full tax credit amount due to presence of other risk mitigants such as portfolio diversification, creditworthy seller indemnities or parent guaranties.

Buyer fee reimbursement becoming standard

Over the past few months, virtually every transaction we’ve executed has included a capped fee reimbursement for the buyer. The size of the reimbursement is largely dependent on the deal size.

General Educational Resources
Billy Lee

Billy Lee

August 12, 2024

Reunion and Summit Ridge Energy host webinar on Tuesday, August 20th for tax credit sellers

Phil Schapiro, VP of Project Finance at Summit Ridge Energy, joins our Q3 seller office hours on Tuesday, August 20th at 2:00pm ET.

General Educational Resources

For Sellers

Reunion recently announced our collaboration with Summit Ridge to sell $40M in tax credits to fund community solar projects.

Phil Schapiro, VP of Project Finance at Summit Ridge Energy, will join Reunion's transactions team on Tuesday, August 20th for a 60-minute workshop covering recent market developments and a discussion about their experience working through a tax credit transaction

Register

Instructions for joining the webinar will be sent once you have registered. If you have any questions, please contact Maria Verbaite.

URL Button

We will make a recording available for those who cannot attend the webinar live.

Topics

The workshop will include three 15-minute modules, with about five minutes of Q&A per module.

Speakers

Phil Schapiro – Summit Ridge Energy

Phil Schapiro is VP of Project Finance at Summit Ridge Energy, where he leads fundraising efforts across the capital stack including debt, equity, and monetization of tax credits.

Andy Moon and Billy Lee – Reunion

Andy Moon and Billy Lee are the co-founders of Reunion and work closely with Fortune 500 corporations and clean energy companies to buy and sell clean energy tax credits.

Andy and Billy have led hundreds of clean energy financings since 2006, including some of the first solar transactions with institutions such as US Bank, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, D.E. Shaw, and others. 

Questions welcome

We want our office hours to be interactive, so please bring any questions you have, whether related to current market conditions, pricing, or commercial terms.

You're welcome to ask questions beforehand.

Terms, Mechanics & Best Practices
Andy Moon

Andy Moon

August 9, 2024

Reunion collaborates with Summit Ridge Energy on $40M ITC credit transfer from community solar portfolio

Reunion announced today that it has collaborated with Summit Ridge Energy, the leading commercial solar company in the United States, to sell approximately $40 million of transferable tax credits from a portfolio of community solar projects in Virginia.

Terms, Mechanics & Best Practices

For Sellers

For Buyers

Latest News

Coverage of the latest market news and trends.

Reunion Accelerates Investment Into Clean Energy

Reunion’s team has been at the forefront of clean energy financing for the last twenty years. We help CFOs and corporate tax teams purchase clean energy tax credits through a detailed and comprehensive transaction process.

Get Started