Reunion
December 18, 2023
10 Questions with Reunion, Episode 5: Tax Credit Investor Insurance with Marsh
In episode 5 of 10 Questions with Reunion, our president, Billy Lee, sits down with David Kinzel of Marsh to discuss tax credit investor insurance. As David notes, credit insurance has the potential to meaningfully "expand the universe of buyers well beyond what it is today and add more liquidity into the transferability market."
For Sellers
For Buyers
Introduction
In episode 5 of 10 Questions with Reunion, our president, Billy Lee, sits down with David Kinzel of Marsh to discuss tax credit investor default insurance. Marsh designed this innovative and evolving insurance solution as a "credit enhancement" for buyers of transferable tax credits who are considering forward purchase commitments.
As David notes, tax credit investor default insurance has the potential to meaningfully "expand the universe of buyers well beyond what it is today and add more liquidity to the transferability market."
Listen on Spotify or Apple
10 Questions with Reunion is available as a podcast on Spotify and Apple.
Guest: David Kinzel, Structured Credit & Political Risk Insurance Consultant, Marsh
David Kinzel is a Vice President in Marsh's Structured Credit and Political Risk group. Marsh is the largest insurance broker in the world.
Takeways
- Credit insurance expands the universe of potential buyers of transferable tax credits. By providing a credit enhancement to would-be transferable tax credit buyers, credit insurance allows more companies to buy tax credits on a forward basis. According to a Marsh analysis, over 1,400 companies could be eligible.
- Credit insurance is relatively new with respect to transferability. Insurers are beginning to explore credit insurance for transferable tax credit transactions, which should expand the scope of eligible deals.
- Underwriting is evolving but relatively straightforward. Underwriters will consider the financial strength of the buyer, the experience and reputation of the developer, the duration of the commitment, and the experience of advisors involved in the transaction.
- A credit insurance policy has three parties: the developer, the buyer, and the lender. The developer would be the insured, the buyer would be the insured counter-party, and the lender would be the "loss payee," or the party who would have rights to the policy proceeds in the event of a valid claim. The lender generally provides a bridge or construction loan to the developer.
- Many privately held companies would be insurable. Companies without publicly rated debt, including privately held companies, would be eligible for tax credit insurance.
- In the event of default on the forward contract, the insurer could become the purchaser of the credits. If the tax credit buyer doesn't perform on the forward commitment, the credits haven't been transferred. Therefore, the insurer could purchase the credits as part of their recovery.
- Coverage will usually cost less if an insurer has more recovery options. Insurers look for multiple pathways to being made whole, and the more pathways they have lowers the risk of the deal.
- A good starting point for the cost of credit insurance is an annualized 1% of the commitment amount. Pricing would likely go down for higher credit qualities and shorter durations. Pricing would likely go up for more challenging credits and longer durations.
Video
Video Chapters
- 0:00 - Introductions
- 2:05 - Question 1: How can credit risk insurance be applied to tax credit transfer transactions?
- 4:43 - Questions 2 and 3: How deep is the tax credit investor default insurance market today? How deep could the market become?
- 6:00 - Question 4: What would underwriting and due diligence look like for investor default insurance?
- 8:21 - Questions 5 and 6: Could any tax credit buyer be insured? Why would a tax credit buyer need a credit enhancement?
- 11:01 - Question 7: How would a tax credit investor default insurance policy be structured?
- 12:26 - Question 8: How could an insurer "step into the shoes" – that is, become the purchaser of the credits – of a buyer in the event of an insurance claim?
- 14:27 - Question 9: Theoretically, will coverage cost less if insurers have more recovery options?
- 15:06 - Question 10: How much does this insurance cost today? How much do you think this insurance will cost over time?
Transcript
Introductions
Billy Lee: Hello, and thank you for joining our webinar series, 10 Questions with Reunion. My name is Billy Lee, and I'm the President and Co-Founder of Reunion, the leading marketplace for clean energy tax credits. We work with corporate finance teams to purchase tax credits from solar, wind, battery, and other clean energy projects.
Today, we are joined by David Kinzel, Vice President of Structured Credit and Political Risk at Marsh. I'm excited to speak with you, David, because risk management – that is, the comprehensive identification and proper allocation of risk – is core to the tax credit marketplace. Innovations around risk management are critical to growing this market.
Let's get into it. David, for starters, can you tell us who you are, what you do, and where this webinar finds you today?
David Kinzel: Thanks, Billy. I appreciate you having me here today. I am part of Marsh's Credit Specialties Division. For those who don't know, Marsh is the largest insurance broker in the world but has teams who are specialized in niches within the insurance world – mine being credit and political risks. I've been working in the world of credit risk for over 15 years and have a lot of experience in political risk (but that's an interesting topic for another day).
Billy Lee: David, where are you calling in from?
David Kinzel: I'm based out of Denver, Colorado.
Billy Lee: Excellent. Insurance in the context of tax credit transferability usually focuses on tax credit insurance, where an insurer is covering the risk that a tax credit is disallowed or recaptured by the IRS. With transferable tax credits, this insurance is important because, generally, buyers bear this risk, and sellers often do not have the balance sheet wherewithal to stand behind their indemnities.
Question 1: How can credit risk insurance be applied to tax credit transfer transactions?
Billy Lee: You and I had an interesting discussion the other day about how credit risk insurance could also be applied to tax credit transfer transactions, specifically in the context of forward commitments. Can you provide some detail here?
David Kinzel: Yes, we had an interesting dialog. And, to be clear, credit insurance is different from what our talented tax credit insurance team does. Our team is focused on more of a credit enhancement for the tax credit buyer.
We can take a step back to get a little bit more context. Credit insurance covers the default of a financial obligation. The market has been around for years but has been evolving over the past decade or so. Recently, we've been looking into more complex transactions beyond short-term trade receivables. We've been looking at insuring the default of a project finance loan and we've been looking at insuring offtake agreements. (Under a power purchase agreement, there's credit risk as well.) It's a creative and evolving segment of the insurance world.
When we look at transferability, we're thinking of credit enhancement for the tax credit buyer who makes a forward purchase commitment. We're effectively insuring the financial commitment of the tax credit buyer. From our understanding and our discussions, it seems like lenders – whether it be bridge lenders or construction lenders – have a binary view of the credit risk of the tax credit buyer. They say, "If that tax credit buyer is investment grade, we can fund the project. If they're not, then you need to find a new tax credit buyer."
So, we see credit insurance as an opportunity to open up the universe of eligible tax credit buyers.
Billy Lee: When a developer is seeking a forward commitment to sell their tax credits to a buyer – that is, they are starting construction on a project that's going to take two years, they want a buyer to be there in two years to buy the credits, but they want to contract now – the creditworthiness of that buyer is important because, typically, a developer is entering into that contract to finance that bridge loan. When we have buyers who may not be as creditworthy, then your product could come in handy.
David Kinzel: That's exactly right. Perfectly said.
Question 2: How deep is the tax credit investor default insurance market today?
Billy Lee: How deep is this market? Maybe it's not deep today, but how deep do you think it can become?
David Kinzel: As you said, Billy, it's a new market. It's evolving as we go, so it's hard to give concrete numbers. But we, Marsh, are building out this market. There's a lot of insurer interest. A lot of insurers have expressed interest in diving into this market. And, once they understand more about insuring these risks, I think there's going to be a short-term and a long-term approach.
When we say short-term, insurers are probably going to have more appetite for vanilla transactions. We're thinking ITCs because of the shorter duration of the risk that they would be taking on. We're thinking there could be anywhere up to $100 million per transaction. So, $100 million of tax credits or commitments could be insurable, which, from my understanding, should cover the majority of the transactions that are going on today or in the near future.
Question 3: How deep could the market become?
David Kinzel: When we look to the longer term, there's going to be a lot more appetite for more complex transactions. PTCs could become eligible, given their longer term nature of credit risk.
Question 4: What would underwriting and due diligence look like for investor default insurance?
Billy Lee: What would the underwriting for a credit transaction of this type look like? What would the diligence be? I imagine it would be much different than your typical tax credit insurance.
David Kinzel: It's evolving. Initially, we think that underwriters are going to take a conservative and traditional view of the risk.They're going to dive into the credit risk of the tax credit buyer by looking at audited financials. How creditworthy are they to make this investment? Is there anything coming up that could impact their ability to make that investment when the time comes and the tax credits are available? Ultimately, that's going to be the first layer underwriters are going to look at. You have to pass that test.
Then, once they drill deeper, they're going to look at the developer. Does the developer have a good reputation? Are they reliable?
Underwriters are going to look at the duration of the forward commitment. A six-month commitment is going to be different from a 24-month commitment. So, duration – from the time the tax credit transfer agreement is signed to the time that the tax credits are transferred – will be part of the analysis.
Many people want to know, "Are insurers going to dig into the underlying contracts? Are they going to want to see all these contracts and get into the details?" The answer is no. However, they're going to want to see portions of the tax credit transfer agreement. It's important to clarify that they're insuring the default of a legally enforceable obligation. If, for some reason, there's a situation where one of the tax credit buyers says, "We found a way to back out of this commitment because of one of the clauses within the agreement," the insurers aren't looking to provide protection for a bad contract. It's important to just make that clarification and distinction.
It's also important to say the underwriters are probably going to look at what advisors are involved in these transactions. If there are advisors like you, Billy, who have a lot of experience in structuring these transactions and getting clean documents together, that's going to give them comfort as well.
Questions 5 and 6: Could any tax credit buyer be insured? Why would a tax credit buyer need a credit enhancement?
Billy Lee: You mentioned something interesting about insurers analyzing audited financials and credit. I guess the question is, could any tax credit buyer be considered an insured? And, if a potential buyer has to have some minimum level of credit, does that defeat the purpose of insurers? If you have credit already, why do you need a credit enhancement?
David Kinzel: Those are really good questions. Not every tax credit buyer would be considered insurable. But I don't believe that defeats the purpose of the insurance, and I'll explain why. In the short-term, we expect the insurer's appetite is going to be for more S&P BB risks. So, one notch below investment grade is probably where there's going to be the most appetite. This is also good for privately held companies – companies without publicly rated debt. That is something that the credit insurance market is comfortable with. Looking at financials and backing into an implied rating is something they're doing on a regular basis; that's not going to be a problem.
Where we get excited is we've done some analysis of S&P data and looked at the universe of all the rated entities in the United States. If you look at who is investment grade, there's approximately 1,200 investment grade issuers in the United States. That says the potential universe of companies that can invest in tax credits on a forward commitment is around 1,200 – a big number. But what could we do differently? If we go down the credit curve and say BB entities are eligible, maybe even B entities, that adds another estimated 1,400 entities.
On top of that, if we look at privately held entities that don't have public debt, or if we look at U.S. subsidiaries of a foreign parent where the parent may be investment grade but doesn't want to give a parental guarantee – there are many situations where this could come into play. We see credit insurance as an opportunity to expand the universe of potential buyers well beyond what it is today and add more liquidity into the market.
Billy Lee: Those are interesting numbers. Right off the bat, we're doubling the potential universe of buyers. That's great. We need more of that type of thinking and creativity.
Question 7: How would a tax credit investor default insurance policy be structured?
Billy Lee: How would a policy like this be structured, from a mechanical standpoint?
David Kinzel: I'll keep it simple. There will be three parties involved. First, you would have the developer, and they would be the insured on the policy. They're going to be who purchases the policy.
The second party would be the insured counter-party, or the tax credit buyer. That's the party that could trigger a claim by defaulting on the legally enforceable obligation that we talked about.
Third would be the lender. The lender would be what's called a "lost payee." They'd be named on the policy and, if there was a claim paid, they would have rights to the proceeds, giving them that comfort of why the policy is there in the first place. The claim could be triggered by a number of different things – for example, you could have a 12-month forward commitment and the tax credit buyer files insolvency on month six. A second scenario could be where the tax credits are transferred and there's some agreement to pay after the transfer event; if there are payment terms like that, that would trigger a claim as well. Really, any situation in which the tax credit buyer defaults on the contract that we're wrapping in insurance, that's where claims would be triggered, and that's how it would be structured from a general level.
Question 8: How could an insurer "step into the shoes" – that is, become the purchaser of the credits – of a buyer in the event of an insurance claim?
Billy Lee: We also spent some time talking about how an insurer could step into the shoes of a buyer in the event of a claim, which I think is really interesting. Could you explain this arrangement? Also, would an insurer need to have privity to the purchase and sale agreement? Would it become a three-way tax transfer agreement?
David Kinzel: It's interesting. We've talked a lot about the underwriting process and how it works based on credit quality. But another important factor that the insurance market takes into account is the potential for recoveries. Once an insurance company pays a claim, it's not like they sit there and say, "We made a bad decision. Let's move on to the next one." They are going to be going back and looking for recoveries in any way that they can to minimize their loss. That's part of their process, and there are three ways they can go through it. First, they would go after the tax credit buyer under their breach of that legally enforceable obligation to commit the capital.
If the insurer isn't successful there, they'd have the expectation that the developer would help them find a new buyer for the tax credits. The third step is the interesting thing that we talked about: there could be a situation where the insurer may say, "We paid a claim, but our recoveries could be in the form of a tax credit" – that is, finding a way to say the tax credits have not been transferred to the original tax credit buyer. Since there's not a buyer anymore because they defaulted on that contract, could the insurance company step in take those tax credits for themselves? This is something we're exploring and talking about, and it seems possible.
Question 9: Theoretically, will coverage cost less if insurers have more recovery options?
Billy Lee: Right. If you give insurers more backup options to ultimately recover, the more willing they will be to extend that coverage, and perhaps the coverage will cost less theoretically, correct?
David Kinzel: Exactly. That could impact the cost and how far down the credit curve we can go. There's a lot of implications as the market develops. If the insurers get good experience and get comfortable, it could really open up the universe of who would be eligible to be insured as a tax credit buyer.
Question 10: How much does this insurance cost today? How much do you think this insurance will cost over time?
Billy Lee: Great. The immediate follow-up question and my last question is the million dollar question: How much does this insurance cost today? Obviously, there's probably been very few data points, but how much do you think this coverage will cost over time? Will it go down as more of these policies are written?
David Kinzel: The market's developing. I think there is going to be quite a bit of variation based on the risk with all those underwriting factors that we talked about. But we know the market really well. We've been in this market for a long time. I think a good starting point is around an annualized 1% on the commitment amount that's going to be insured. And that could go down as we see better credit quality, more comfort from insurers. I would expect that to go down for the higher credit qualities and the shorter duration risk. Whereas if we look at going down the credit curve to more challenging credits and longer durations, then it could be above that 1% annualized threshold. But that's a good base estimate if people are looking to explore this at a high level.
Billy Lee: David, this has been a great conversation. I love connecting with thought leaders and innovators, particularly around risk management. Thank you for your time. Thank you for tuning into 10 Questions. We'll see you next time.
Reunion
February 16, 2024
Reunion's Transferable Tax Credit Handbook
The comprehensive guide to buying and selling clean energy tax credits.
For Sellers
For Buyers
Read by over 2,000 members of the transferable tax credit market
Since launching in October 2023, Reunion's handbook has been read by over 2,000 members of the transferable tax credit market, including hundreds of attorneys, accountants, and other strategic advisors.
Preview what's inside
Before downloading our comprehensive guide to buying and selling clean energy tax credits, we hope you'll take a peak inside.
Download the complete, 100-page handbook
Once you have downloaded our handbook, we will email you whenever we release an update.
Denis Cook
October 19, 2023
Developers Have 21 Business Days to Submit Their Low-Income Bonus Applications
The allocation portal opened at 9:00am ET on Thursday, October 19th. All applications received within the first 30 days will be treated as received at the same time. The last day, November 17th, is when the federal government will potentially shut down, unless Congress passes a budget or another continuing resolution.
For Sellers
For Buyers
Takeaways
- The low-income community bonus is an allocated – that is, capped – credit, and we believe it will be fully utilized
- Developers must apply for an allocation through the Department of Energy. All applications received within the initial 30 days will be treated as received at the same time
- There are 21 business days in the 30-day window. The last day coincides with the expiration of the federal government’s current continuing resolution
- Allocation amounts can different from applied-for amounts
Overview of the low-income community bonus
The low-income bonus is designed to incentivize investment in communities that have historically been left behind. Specifically, the credit promotes wind, solar, and associated energy storage investments in low-income communities, on Indian land, as part of affordable housing developments, or benefitting low-income households.
The low-income bonus is an allocated credit. For 2023, the bonus is subject to an 1,800 MW annual capacity limitation, which is further allocated across four categories:
- Located in a low-income community: 700 MW
- Located on Indian land: 200 MW
- Qualified Low-Income Residential Project: 200 MW
- Qualified Low-Income Economic Benefit Project: 700 MW
Projects in the first two categories receive a 10% bonus credit value, while projects in the third and fourth categories receive a 20% bonus credit value. All low-income projects must be less than 5 MWac in size.
For 2023, the 700 MW in category one will be further subdivided: 560 MW will be reserved for residential rooftop solar and other “behind-the-meter” (BTM) facilities, and 140 MW will be reserved for “front-of-the-meter” (FTM) facilities.
The bonus is available for §48 and §48E credits
The low-income bonus is only applicable to §48 and §48E investment tax credits. The latter credit, the technology-neutral ITC, is available to projects placed in service in 2025 or later, so it’s possible that many developers will generate §48E ITCs.
How to apply
Since the low-income bonus is an allocated bonus, developers must apply for and receive an allocation from the IRS. (The DOE administers the application process, but the IRS ultimately makes allocation decisions.)
The DOE has published a checklist for applicants in each category.
If any category or sub-category is oversubscribed during the initial 30-day period, the IRS will make awards based on a randomized lottery. Following the initial 30-day period, any leftover capacity will be awarded on a first-come, first-served basis. Applicants may only submit one application per facility, per program year.
The IRS will make allocations with certain ownership and location priorities in mind:
- Ownership: Priority will be given to (1) projects owned directly or indirectly by Indian tribes; (2) consumer or purchasing cooperatives with controlling members who are workers or from low-income households; (3) tax-exempt charities and religious organizations; and (4) state and local governments, and U.S. territories, Indian tribes, and rural electrical cooperatives
- Location: Priority will be given to (1) persistent poverty counties, where 20% of residents have experienced high rates of poverty of the last 30 years; and (2) and census tracts designated as “disadvantaged” in the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST)
Once a developer has an allocation, they will have four years to complete the project and place it in service.
When to apply
All applications received within the first 30 days will be treated as received at the same time
The allocation portal opened on Thursday, October 19th at 9:00am ET. Applications submitted within 30 days of this date will be treated as submitted on the same date and at the same time.
Submit applications before November 17th, when the federal government’s current continuing resolution expires
The 30th day of the application window falls on Friday, November 17th. Developers should strive to submit their applications before this day because the federal government’s current, 45-day continuing resolution expires at the end of it.
Allocation amounts may differ from application amounts
Developers who receive an allocation will receive an award letter from the IRS with their allocation amount. Notably, the IRS makes it clear that a developer “may receive an allocation less than its [applied for] nameplate capacity.”
The allocation, not the project’s capacity, determines the credit value.
Reunion expects the IRS to fully allocate the credit
The IRS and DOE have stated that they can adjust the category allotments within the low-income bonus credit to ensure full allocation. Therefore, we expect the low-income bonus to be fully utilized every year – likely within the 30-day, all-applications-are-equal window.
The IRS and DOE have released extensive guidance and detailed resources for applicants
Guidance
- Initial guidance (February 13, 2023): Notice 2023-17, Initial Guidance Establishing Program to Allocate Environmental Justice Solar and Wind Capacity Limitation Under §48(e)
- Proposed regulations (May 31, 2023): Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Additional Guidance on Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program
- Final regulations (August 10, 2023): Final Regulations, Additional Guidance on Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program
- Revenue procedure (August 10, 2023): Revenue Procedure 2023-27
Resources
- The Department of Energy (DOE) maintains a low-income communities bonus credit program website
- Applicant checklist
- Category 1 eligibility map with CEJST and persistent poverty county screens
- Category 3 eligible covered housing programs
- Category 4 household income limits
Reunion
October 12, 2023
The Transferable Tax Credit Market Has Arrived
Our Q3 2023 email update to corporate taxpayers.
For Sellers
For Buyers
Hello,
The market for transferable tax credits has gained momentum heading into Q4, as many buyers want to get their first deals done in the 2023 tax year. We expect the volume of deals to increase substantially as we reach the end of the year.
Exploring the latest market developments with EY and Troutman Pepper
In the latest edition of 10 Questions With Reunion, Brian Murphy of EY, Adam Kobos of Troutman Pepper, and our CEO, Andy Moon, discuss what they are seeing in transferable tax credit transactions.
The wide-ranging discussion covers topics of interest to tax credit buyers including pricing, using credits to offset estimated tax payments, timing of the IRS portal, and how to mitigate project risks.
Watch the full episode here.
See you at TEI on October 22-25 in NYC
Reunion is headed to New York on October 22-25 to attend the Tax Executives Institute (TEI) Annual Conference. Reunion CEO Andy Moon will be speaking on a panel about tax credit transfers. If you’d like to meet and discuss tax credit transfers while we are in New York, please schedule a meeting with us.
Best of luck to everyone closing out the quarter!
Team Reunion
Reunion
October 16, 2023
Can a Non-Profit Sell Tax Credits?
While ineligible for transferability, non-profits can monetize clean energy tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act’s “elective pay” mechanism.
For Sellers
As the leading marketplace for clean energy tax credits, Reunion has been approached by many non-profit organizations to help them monetize clean energy credits, primarily from distributed solar projects. Unfortunately, non-profits are not able to transfer tax credits to third parties.
But non-profits have an alternative. The elective pay provision, sometimes called direct pay, allows “applicable entities,” including tax-exempt entities, to benefit from IRA clean energy tax credits even though they are not traditional taxpayers. This provision allows non-profits to receive refund payments directly from the IRS for the amount of eligible credits claimed.
Unlike transferable tax credits, where credits are purchased at a discount to their face value, applicable entities are entitled to receive the full amount of the credits from the IRS.
In order to qualify for elective pay, an applicable entity needs to pre-register its project with the IRS and receive a registration number. The direct payment election is made on Form 990-T, and the amount of credit would be treated as a payment of tax, which would be refundable, absent any other tax liability.
The elective payment provisions of the IRA are codified in IRC §6417. The internal revenue code (IRC) defines six applicable entities that are eligible for elective pay:
- Organizations exempt from income tax
- Any state or political subdivision thereof
- The Tennessee Valley Authority
- An Indian tribal government
- Rural energy cooperatives
- Alaska Native Corporations
Most nonprofits, including 501(c)(3) and 501(d) entities, fall into the first category.
12 credits are available for elective pay:
- §48: Energy Credit
- §48E: Clean Electricity Investment Credit
- §45: Renewable Electricity Production Credit
- §45Y: Clean Electricity Production Credit
- §45W: Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit
- §45U: Zero-emission Nuclear Power Production Credit
- §45X: Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit
- §45V: Clean Hydrogen Production Credit
- §45Z: Clean Fuel Production Credit
- §45Q: Carbon Oxide Sequestration Credit
- §30C: Credit for Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling/Recharging Property
- §48C: Qualifying Advanced Energy Project Credit
Denis Cook
May 20, 2024
How Do Differences in Fiscal Year-End Dates Affect Tax Credit Transfers?
A review of how tax year-end affects transferability for buyers and sellers.
For Sellers
For Buyers
Transferable tax credits are a powerful tool for profitable companies looking to manage their federal tax liability. When buying transferable tax credits, however, companies must consider their tax year-end in conjunction with that of the seller in order to claim the credits correctly and to the greatest extent possible.
IRC §6418(d) dictates tax credit purchase timing between buyers and sellers
Internal Revenue Code §6418(d) explains the specific rule relating to the relationship between a buyer’s (transferee taxpayer) and seller’s (eligible taxpayer) tax year-ends.
"In the case of any credit (or portion thereof) with respect to which an election is made under subsection (a), such credit shall be taken into account in the first taxable year of the transferee taxpayer ending with, or after, the taxable year of the eligible taxpayer with respect to which the credit was determined."
Corporate taxpayers will face one of three scenarios when engaging tax credit sellers
Scenario 1: Buyer and seller both have a calendar year-end
For transactions where both the buyer and seller have a 12/31 tax year-end date, the credits simply apply to the tax year in which they were generated.

Scenario 2: Buyer's tax year ends before that of the seller
For a transaction where the buyer tax year ends before that of the seller – for example, the buyer has a 9/30 tax year, and the seller has a 12/31 tax year – any credits generated in the same calendar year are pushed into the next tax year for the buyer.

Scenario 3: Buyer's tax year ends after that of the seller
Lastly, for a transaction where the seller's tax year ends before that of the buyer, credits generated prior to the end of the seller tax year will apply to the current calendar year, but credits generated after the end of the seller tax year will push into the next calendar year.

Most eligible corporate taxpayers are calendar-year filers
There are approximately 600 publicly traded companies in the U.S. with a trailing 12-month income tax liability over $100M (as of May 2024).
Of these companies, 78% are calendar-year filers, while another 8.0% close out their fiscal year in February or September.

If we increase the threshold to $500M of trailing 12-month income tax liability, the numbers remain consistent: 78.2% of companies are calendar-year filers.
Find credits that complement your company's tax year-end
To find clean energy tax credits that complement your company's tax year-end, please contact Reunion's transactions team. In addition to providing access to our tax credit marketplace, we can curate a list of projects that most closely align with your needs.
Reunion Accelerates Investment Into Clean Energy
Reunion’s team has been at the forefront of clean energy financing for the last twenty years. We help CFOs and corporate tax teams purchase clean energy tax credits through a detailed and comprehensive transaction process.
